Legal Opinion

Story v. Lamb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

In March, 1878, the defendant in this case obtained a horse of the plaintiff, and gave him in exchange therefor, beside a twenty-five dollar note endorsed by his father, the following contract, viz:

*526“$150. Columbus, July 18th, 1877.

On or before two years after date we promise to pay to John A. Lamb, or order, the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, value received, with ten per cent, interest, and current rate of exchange or express charges. This note is given for the purchase of the instrument below, which instrument is to remain the property of John A. Lamb until this note is paid in full,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb v. StoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Brooks v. HargreavesMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Fralick v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Barger v. FarnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API