Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Campbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1896PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Bill by Robert H. Wilson against Elizabeth A. Campbell to compel the discharge of a mortgage, and cross-bill by defendant against complainant, Mrs. John.F. Nichols, and others, to foreclose the same mortgage. From a decree for complainant on the original bill, and dismissing 'the cross-bill, defendant Campbell appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The hearing is on a bill filed by the complainant to compel the discharge of a mortgage executed by Freeling H. Potter and wife to defendant, and on a cross-bill filed to foreclose the mortgage. The complainant has succeeded to the title of Potter. The facts *582are that on January 27, 1886, Potter made his promissory note, payable to Edwin E. White or bearer, for $550, due April 1, 1892, with coupons attached, representing the installments of interest. Principal and interest were made payable at the office of S. S. Walker, St. Johns, Mich. The note contained a provision that, in case of default…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BulteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Belknap v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Purdy v. . HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Frost v. FisherColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API