Legal Opinion

Altman v. Rittershofer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts >are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

It is conceded that, unless the written instrument upon which suit is brought is a negotiable promissory note, the plaintiffs cannot recover. It reads as follows:

“$>130. Bay City, Michigan, October 17, 1885.
“ Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of M. Cohn one hundred and thirty dollars, at the Bay National Bank of Bay City, Mich., for value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws; with ■eight per cent, interest from date until paid, and attorney’s fees. Frederick Rittershoeer.”

The instrument is indorsed “M. Cohn.”

A promissory note is an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Gaar v. Louisville Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. Sperry v. HorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Jones v. RadatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API