Legal Opinion

Peabody v. McAvoy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to St. Clair Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This was an action to recover the amount of a promissory note made and payable in Canada.

Peabody, as indorsee and holder, brought the suit against McAyoy as maker, and the main question was whether the Canadian stamp acts made it invalid. The trial was without a jury, and the court, upon proof of the Canadian laws, ruled that they rendered the note invalid. It is now urged for the plaintiff, that although the court found, as a fact, that the provincial statutes made the note invalid, yet, that the meaning of the foreign law was not a question of fact, but one of law; and that in deciding that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Wright v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Tillman v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Thomas v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Dennison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Neib v. HindererMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Dodge v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hindman v. FriedrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API