Legal Opinion

Weist v. Morlock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Trover by Sophia Weist, administratrix of the estate of Mary Breidinger, deceased, against Frank Morlock. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

This case involves $300, and was tried before the court without a jury. The court made written findings of facts and law, to none of which were any exceptions taken. Several errors are assigned upon both. Under the repeated decisions of this court, the only question open for decision is whether the findings support the judgment. Upon this point there is no allegation of error, *607and it is not argued in the brief. It is not, therefore, open for consideration. Cook v. Burnett, 83 Mich. 251. We have, however, examined the findings sufficiently to hold that they support the judgment.

Judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. BurnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  2. Kooman v. De JongeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Messer v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Stafford v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wormley v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API