United States v. Harris
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused was convicted of four specifications alleging that, with the intent to gratify his sexual desires, he took indecent liberties with two girls, one 111 years of age and the other seven years of age. A board of review affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence by cutting the period of confinement adjudged from ten years to four years.
In his first assignment of error the accused contends that he was prejudiced by the failure of the convening authority to appoint qualified counsel to represent him at the Article 32 investigation.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. VaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. BerthiaumeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. RobertsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. BrittUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. TrosperNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- Soriano v. HoskenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980