United States v. Trosper
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WYNNE, Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response. The findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. Our reasoning is set out below.
In accordance with his pleas the appellant was convicted of misprision of a serious offense, intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1994) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant does not contest these findings.
Rather, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. AllberyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999