Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Mickel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 6, 1958No. 11,003PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*326Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force has certified the case to this Court for review of the following question :

“Was the Board of Review correct in holding that the failure to provide accused with counsel qualified within the meaning of Article 27 (b) at the Article 32 investigation constituted reversible error in the absence of specific prejudice and timely objection ?”

An accused is entitled to qualified counsel during the Article 32 investigation. United States v Tomaszewski, 8 USCMA 266, 24 CMR 76. The investigation here was held in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. SchullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. CulpUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. SchafferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. ChuculateUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API