Legal Opinion
Remmenga v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 1985No. B004110PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLARD, J. *
This case raises questions concerning the constitutionality of sections 30610.3 and 30610.8 of the Public Resources Code. Appellants sought a writ of mandate from the trial court to compel the California Coastal Commission to issue a development permit without payment of the $5,000 fee required by section 30610.8. They appeal from the trial court’s denial of their petition. We find the statutes compatible with the state and federal Constitutions and affirm.
Facts
The Hollister Ranch subdivision comprises approximately 14,000 acres of land in Santa Barbara County, fronting on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Rossco Holdings Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Paoli v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.