Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Skrupa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1963No. 111PublishedCited by 1,013 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

In this case, properly here on appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, we are asked to review the judgment of a three-judge District Court enjoining, as being in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a Kansas statute making it a misdemeanor for any person to engage “in the business of debt adjusting” except as an incident to “the lawful practice of law in this state.” The statute defines “debt adjusting” as “the making of a contract, express, or implied with a particular debtor whereby the debtor agrees to pay a certain amount of money periodically to the person engaged in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,013 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

1,008 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API