Legal Opinion
Rossco Holdings Inc. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1989No. B035188PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiffs Rossco Holdings Incorporated, doing business as Quaker Corporation, (Quaker) and Michel T. Ghosn (Ghosn) (collectively, appellants) appeal the order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer interposed by the defendants, State of California (the State) and the California Coastal Commission (the Commission) (collectively respondents). 1 , 2
Summary Statement
Appellants own substantial acreage in the Malibu-Santa Monica Mountains area of the County of Los Angeles (the County). Quaker holds title to the 227-acre Quaker property and the 102-acre…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lynch v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- City of Santee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Healing v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.