Legal Opinion

Smith v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1978No. 7727IC105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The sole question on this appeal is whether plaintiff’s injury resulted from an accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Industrial Commission answered the question in the negative, and we are constrained to affirm its decision.

Findings of fact by the Industrial Commission are conclusive and binding on appeal if supported by competent evidence, even though the record contains evidence that would support contrary findings. Blalock v. Roberts Co., 12 N.C. App. 499, 183 S.E. 2d 827 (1971). In the instant case the Commission adopted the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Pardue v. BLACKBURN BROTHERS OIL & TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Dunton v. Daniel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calderwood v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Bowles v. CTS of Asheville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API