Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Except in the case of certain occupational diseases, compensation may not be awarded under the Workmen’s Compensation Act unless there is proof of a disability due to an injury, which injury was the result of an accident arising out of and in- the course of the employment. G.S. 97-2(6). A finding by the Industrial Commission that the claimant sustained such an injury is conclusive upon an appeal to the courts if, but only if, the Commission had before it competent evidence sufficient to support such a finding. Lawrence v. Mill, 265 N.C. 329, 144 S.E. 2d 3.
The terms “injury” and “accident,” as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- O'Mary v. Land Clearing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lawrence v. Hatch MillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by29 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Sims v. Charmes/Arby's Roast BeefCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Pollard v. Krispy Waffle No. 1Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.