Legal Opinion
Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 20, 1971No. 7111IC505PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
By appropriate assignment of error defendants contend that the Commission’s finding of fact number 2 is not supported by the evidence. There is ample competent evidence in the record to support this finding of fact, and in addition thereto, defendants state in their brief:
“The question in this case is not whether Blalock sustained an injury to the calf of his leg while moving a heavy object on the job. This is admitted. The question in the case is whether certain operations and the ultimate amputation of Blalock’s leg above the knee were causally connected with a minor injury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Robbins v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Rooks v. IDEAL CEMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Key v. Wagner Woodcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Dye v. Shippers Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Jenkins v. Easco AluminumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.