Legal Opinion

Dunton v. Daniel Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 25, 1973No. 735IC480PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The. sole question presented is whether the evidence supports the finding that plaintiff sustained an injury by “accident” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute, G.S. 97-2(6), and as defined by the North Carolina Supreme Court. “To sustain an award of compensation in ruptured or slipped disc cases the injury to be classed as arising by accident must involve more than merely carrying on the usual and customary duties in the usual way. . . . Accident involves the interruption of the work routine and the introduction thereby of unusual conditions likely to result…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Key v. Wagner Woodcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Trudell v. Seven Lakes Heating & Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Smith v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Coffey v. Automatic Lathe CutterheadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Pulley v. Migrant & Seasonal Farmworkers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API