Legal Opinion
Pardue v. BLACKBURN BROTHERS OIL & TIRE COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 30, 1963No. 384PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.
Defendants except to the judgment below on the ground that the conclusions of law and award of the Commission are “not supported by sufficient findings of fact and evidence that appellee sustained -an injury by accident.”
With respect to plaintiff’s duties and the occurrence from which the injury arose, the Commission made only the following findings of fact:
“1. Plaintiff . . . began working for defendant employer on December 28, 1961, Ms duties toeing to recap tires.
“2. On February 28, 1962, the plaintiff was mounting a tractor tire on a tractor; that the .tire was a large tractor tire; that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Carroll v. Daniels & Daniels Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.