Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rowe v. Britton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1885No. 12,130PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The bond upon which the relator’s complaint is based reads thus: “We, Edward G. Eowe and William Britton, are bound unto the State of Indiana in the sum of -dollars, for the payment of which we bind ourselves, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed and dated this 4th day of October, 1873.

“If the above bound Edward G. Eowe will faithfully discharge his duties as guardian of the person and property of Henry Eowe, Mary L. Eowe, Edward G. Eowe and John *215R. Rowe, minor heirs of Mary Rowe, deceased, then the above obligation is to be void, else to remain in force.”

It will be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Jackson Township v. BergIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Cottrell v. Ætna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graeter v. DeWolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Peelle v. State ex rel. HipesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Stults v. ZahnIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Britton v. State ex rel. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State v. SoudrietteIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API