Legal Opinion
City of Logansport v. Uhl
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1885No. 11,989PublishedCited by 57 opinions
From the Cass Circuit Court. .
1Opinion of the Court
Niblack, J. —
This was a suit for an injunction. The complaint was filed on the 5th day of February, 1883, and, by amendment, became a complaint in two paragraphs:
The first paragraph was as follows:
“ Dennis Uhl and Charles H. Uhl, plaintiffs, complain of the city of Logansport, and the trustees of the water-works of the city of Logansport, to wit: William H. Johnson, *532Thomas Austin and Alfred U. McAllister, and respectfully show to the court that the plaintiffs are partners, doing business under the firm name and style of D. & C. H. Uhl; that they are now, and have been for many years, engaged…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Williams v. McMillanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Palmer v. StumphIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- McQuiddy v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.