Legal Opinion

City of Logansport v. Uhl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1885No. 11,989PublishedCited by 57 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court. .

1Opinion of the Court

Niblack, J. —

This was a suit for an injunction. The complaint was filed on the 5th day of February, 1883, and, by amendment, became a complaint in two paragraphs:

The first paragraph was as follows:

“ Dennis Uhl and Charles H. Uhl, plaintiffs, complain of the city of Logansport, and the trustees of the water-works of the city of Logansport, to wit: William H. Johnson, *532Thomas Austin and Alfred U. McAllister, and respectfully show to the court that the plaintiffs are partners, doing business under the firm name and style of D. & C. H. Uhl; that they are now, and have been for many years, engaged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. McMillanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Palmer v. StumphIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. McQuiddy v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API