Legal Opinion

State v. Soudriette

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1886No. 12,788PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, J. —

This was a suit by the’ State of Indiana upon a forfeited recognizance, executed, as alleged, by the appellees, Charles H. and Ebare Soudriette. The appellees severally demurred to the State’s complaint, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,, which demurrer was sustained by the-court. The State excepted to this ruling, and, declining to amend its complaint or plead further, the court adjudged that it take nothing by its suit.

*307The State has appealed, and has here assigned as error the sustaining of appellees’ demurrer to its complaint.

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Miller v. O'ReillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Miller v. McAllisterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State ex rel. Wyant v. WyantIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. State v. WarwickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Cain v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Stanley v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Borman v. Jung Brewing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API