Legal Opinion

Britton v. State ex rel. Rowe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1888No. 13,345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This is the second appeal to this court in this case. On the former appeal herein, the opinion and judgment of the court are reported under the title of State, ex rel., v. Britton, 102 Ind. 214. We then held that, in the first paragraph of her complaint herein, plaintiff’s relatrix, Mary L. Rowe, stated a cause of action amply sufficient to withstand defendant’s demurrer thereto for the alleged insufficiency of the facts therein to constitute a cause of action. After the cause was remanded to the court below, defendant’s demurrer to the first paragraph of complaint was overruled, in obedience…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. McLarinanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. LutesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hood ex rel. Hood v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. State ex rel. Rowe v. BrittonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Harrison v. StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Rusher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kinsley v. KinsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API