Legal Opinion

Stults v. Zahn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1889No. 13,460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

This was an action by Catharine Zahn against Stults and Meech, to recover damages upon an appeal bond executed by the defendants in order to perfect an appeal taken by Stults from the judgment of a justice of the peace to the circuit court of Huntington county, in a suit wherein Mrs. Zahn was the plaintiff and Stults defendant. By the judgment of the justice the plaintiff was awarded the possession of certain 'real estate which Stults occupied as her tenant, and also thirty dollars, besides her costs, as damages.

The appeal was taken on the 2d day of April, 1884, to the circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Opp v. TenEyckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Jones v. DronebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Graeter v. DeWolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Rowe v. BrittonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Stanley v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Opp v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McClanahan v. BreedingIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Majenica Telephone Co. v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. SlussIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API