Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Ætna Life Insurance

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884No. 11,056PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Superior Court of Vigo County.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants for the foreclosure of a mortgage and the appointment of a receiver. An answer and a cross complaint were filed by the appellants. The appellee’s demurrer was sustained to the cross complaint. A trial by the court resulted in a finding and decree of foreclosure, and the appointment of a receiver.

The appellants assign for error that the court below erred in appointing a receiver, and in sustaining the demurrer to their cross complaint, and that the appellee’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Ho…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Branham v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Crumley v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Plowman v. ShidlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ballman v. DuffecyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Leeds v. City of RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API