Legal Opinion

Robson v. Dayton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Ingham; Person, J. Assumpsit by John Robson and others against George M. Dayton and others upon a bond. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action is based upon a bond made by the defendant Dayton, as principal, and his codefendants, as sureties, in the sum of $15,000, with a condition as follows:

‘ ‘ The condition of this obligation is such that whereas the above suit in chancery is pending for an accounting and settlement of a partnership heretofore existing between the parties thereto, in which each side claims rights not conceded by the other, and each said complainants and said defendant claim a sum of money due, owing, and to be decreed to them, and by mutual agreement it is understood that this obligation shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Township of Cumming v. SchickMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gemberling v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Butts v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Boyer v. SowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hollenbeck v. BreakeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API