Robson v. Dayton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Person, J. Assumpsit by John Robson and others against George M. Dayton and others upon a bond. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action is based upon a bond made by the defendant Dayton, as principal, and his codefendants, as sureties, in the sum of $15,000, with a condition as follows:
‘ ‘ The condition of this obligation is such that whereas the above suit in chancery is pending for an accounting and settlement of a partnership heretofore existing between the parties thereto, in which each side claims rights not conceded by the other, and each said complainants and said defendant claim a sum of money due, owing, and to be decreed to them, and by mutual agreement it is understood that this obligation shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Township of Cumming v. SchickMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Gemberling v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Butts v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Boyer v. SowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Hollenbeck v. BreakeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901