Covina Manor, Inc. v. Hatch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPatrosso, J.
Action in unlawful detainer to recover possession of a dwelling house, wherein plaintiff recovered judgment for restitution of the premises and damages in the sum of $1,470, from which defendants appeal.
The record discloses that defendant William T. Hatch was employed by plaintiff sometime prior to December 5, 1952, and remained in its employ until June 19, 1953, when his employment was terminated. Just what his duties were is not clear from the record, but he is described by an officer of the plaintiff “as a sort of a maintenance man—he had several duties.” The circumstances surrounding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Carteri v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Nahas v. Local 905, Retail Clerks International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gangadean v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Meyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Borden v. StilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023