Legal Opinion
Von Goerlitz v. Turner
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 2, 1944No. Civ. 7050PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEEK, J.—
The plaintiff herein appeals from an order granting defendants’ motion for nonsuit, and from a decree quieting defendants’ title to the property in controversy.
Plaintiff by his action entitled “Complaint in Claim and Delivery” alleged the conversion by defendants of approximately 200 tons of chrome ore of the value of $4,000, and prayed for judgment against defendants for the possession of the ore or the value thereof. The action was originally filed in the county of Siskiyou but was subsequently transferred to the county of Shasta for trial. Defendant Turner filed his answer denying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wheeler v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Shaw v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Elmore v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- O'Shea v. Claude C. Wood Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Howard v. County of AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.