Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Piper

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1924No. Civ. No. 4543PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to quiet plaintiff’s title to an casement in a roadway over defendant’s land and to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s use thereof. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and defendant appeals.

The findings of fact indicate the issues presented for determination. The substance thereof is as follows: Plaintiff is the owner of the west half of lot G in block 12 of the Monrovia tract in the city of Monrovia. The easterly half of the lot, i. e., the easterly three hundred feet, is bounded on its easterly side by Magnolia Street. No other portion of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Des Moines City Railway Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Wagner v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hopper v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Nay v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API