Hayden v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
This action was brought to recover the possession of certain real property in the city of Stockton. The complaint was filed May 23, 1903, and the following facts are therein aptly and sufficiently stated; 1. The due appointment and qualification of the guardian; 2. That the action was brought in behalf of the incompetent; 3. “That said Sarah C. Hayden is, and was at all times herein mentioned, the owner, and is now entitled to the possession of the premises”; 4. That on September 24, 1901, defendant “became a tenant at will of said premises,” and “that he was at all times herein mentioned,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.