Legal Opinion

Meyer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1957No. 108-56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, for damages resulting from an alleged breach of a lease. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 this court is without jurisdiction because the claim upon which plaintiff sues here is pending in a condemnation proceeding in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

The allegations in the petition may be summarized as follows:

On June 22, 1951, the Clark Congress Corporation leased to the United States a 10-story office building in Chicago…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanmeyer v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. Covina Manor, Inc. v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Packard v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  4. Israelson v. WollenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Woodstrom v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Diamond Housing Corporation v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  3. Stephenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Meyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Gloeckner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API