Legal Opinion
Maynard v. Davis
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by Arthur W. Maynard against Daniel L. Davis, Sarah Davis, Lilias G. Davis, and the First Commercial Bank of Pontiac to set aside a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendant Daniel L. Davis appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This cause was heard on pleadings and proofs taken in open court in the court below, and a decree entered setting aside the deed of conveyance as prayed in the bill. . The court below filed a written opinion, which sets out fully the controversy between the parties, as follows:
“On May 1, 1899, complainant was the owner of five houses situated on two lots in the city of Lansing, and a portable sawmill at Imlay City. The defendant D. L. Davis was the owner of a farm of 280 acres in Jackson county, this State. Before that time complainant had listed his property for sale or exchange with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boxheimer v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Outhwite v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Stone v. WellingMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Burroughs v. PloofMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Hanold v. KaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Graham v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Kurbel v. O'HairMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Hoey v. EbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.