Legal Opinion
Graham v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1908No. Docket No. 75PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by Andrew J. Graham against Henry B. Smith upon a promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendant Smith, as maker, and Charles H. Hill, as indorser, of the following promissory note:
“$2,500.00. Bat City, Mich., Jan. 11, 1906.
“Six months after date I promise to pay to Charles H. Hill, or order, twenty-five hundred dollars, at First National Bank, of Bay City, Mich., value received, with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum.
“Henry B. Smith.
“No.-. Due 7-11-6.”
Said note is indorsed upon the back thereof as follows: “ Charles H. Hill. Fred A. Bangs.”
In consequence of fraudulent representations by one of its officers as to the mining property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Payne v. ZellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Mersick v. AldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Brooks v. Sullivan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Burroughs v. PloofMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Maynard v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. MooneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Adrian v. Whitney Central National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Felt v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Taylor & Co. v. Nehi Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.