Legal Opinion

Hoey v. Ebert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 37,607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, C. J.

On May 26, 1925, the defendant, a real estate dealer, negotiated a loan for plaintiff from William E. Baumann and Helen E. Baumann, his wife, for the sum of $355, evidenced by a promissory note, payable one year after date, and secured by a mortgage on a lot owned by plaintiff in the township of Ecorse, in the county of Wayne. Plaintiff paid the interest thereon for one year. He testified that a few days after the second year’s interest became due he told the defendant that he could not pay it up and, after the lapse of considerable time and several conferences, the deféndant said to him, —…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Newton v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Stamp v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Maynard v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoey v. EbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hoey v. EbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API