Legal Opinion

Agar v. Streeter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1914No. 84PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Tuscola; Beach, J. Bill by Thomas Agar and Jonathan Agar against Daniel W. Streeter and Annie E. Streeter for specific performance. Decree for complainants. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrandee, J.

The bill is filed for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. So far as the facts are concerned, the defense -is predicated upon the denial of defendant Annie E. Streeter that she ever signed the instrument relied upon by complainants or was a party thereto. The lease and option relied upon describes the premises as a strip 40 feet wide and 8 rods long. It is so described in the bill. The decree, which recites that the trial court finds that defendant Annie E. Streeter signed the lease and option understanding^ and with, the intention and purpose of uniting therein as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Catlin v. WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  2. Naylor v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ingoldsby v. JuanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Kitchell v. MudgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. LollarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Maples v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API