Legal Opinion

Boxheimer v. Gunn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1872PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from. Kent Circuit. This bill was filed by Francis Boxheimer against William S. Gunn, Hiram H. Sutton, Fanny A. Sutton, Levi Harrington and Denslow D. Davie. Gunn alone answered, and the bill was taken as confessed by the other defendants. Proofs were taken and on the hearing a decree was entered granting the relief prayed. The defendant Gunn appealed. •

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy, Oh. J.

This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by one Hiram H. Sutton (with his wife) to the complainant, upon certain lands in the county of Kent. The consideration stated in the mortgage was one thousand and fifty dollars. It was conditioned for the payment of two certain promissory notes executed by said Sutton, payable to the order of complainant, and indorsed by him, and to save the complainant harmless therefrom; one of said notes bearing date May 14, 1869, for four hundred and fifty dollars, and the other of even date with the mortgage, May 29, 1869, for six…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stone v. WellingMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Arlington Mill & Elevator Co. v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Napa Valley Wine Co. v. RinehartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Matson v. MelchorMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API