Legal Opinion

Hanold v. Kays

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Yan Burén. (Mills, J.) Bill filed to correct mistake in the description of land in a mortgage, and to foreclose the same. Defendant Kays appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Morse, X

This is a suit in equity to rectify a mistake made in the drafting of a mortgage as to the description of the premises, and to foreclose the same upon the land in-' tended to be conveyed therein.

The facts as to the inception of the mortgage are undisputed.

The defendant George W. Owen, on the twenty-third day of June, 1883, borrowed $600 of the complainant. He and his wife gave their note for said sum, payable in one year, with interest at 8 per cent., and secured the same by a real estate mortgage executed and delivered the same day.

The land was known as the “ Lensenmayer forty,” and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boxheimer v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Outhwite v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Bostwick v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellis v. NickleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Harris v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Iowa Nat. Bank v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Maynard v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hogan v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API