Burroughs v. Ploof
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lapeer. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This action is brought upon a promissory note. The defense was that the note was a part of a contract entered into with the Ohio & Great Western Seed Company of Napoleon, Ohio; that the note was without consideration, and was void, as against pub-*608lie policy; and that plaintiff . purchased with notice of such facts.
The note was dated at Lapeer, Mich., December 10, 1886, due on or before one year from date, and was payable to C. H. Williams or bearer, and was for $150, with use at 7 per cent. Embodied in the note, above the signature, is the following certificate:
“ For the purpose of obtaining…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wadsworth v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Graham v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Scharman v. Bay County Bridge CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Maynard v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.