Legal Opinion

Quarles v. General Investment & Development Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 2003No. CIV.A.02-1303(RBW)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WALTON, District Judge.

The present lawsuit appears at first blush to be a garden-variety type Title VII action. However, the motions filed by defendants, which, if granted in total would effectively dispose of all of the claims in plaintiffs’ complaint, raise a host of complicated issues for the Court to resolve. After careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the existing legal precedent, the Court concludes that rulings on defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ class action claims and two of the plaintiffs’ District of Columbia Human Right Act claims must…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Fennell v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Richardson v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Na'Im v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Jones v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. Taylor v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API