Legal Opinion
Na'Im v. Rice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2008No. Civil Action 06-2237 (RMU)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 1 ; Sua Sponte Dismissing in Part the Plaintiff’s Claims; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 2
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court are the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs motion for discovery-pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f). The plaintiff, Intisar R. Na’im, claims racial discrimination, a hostile work environment and…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Na'im v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Whorton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Moore v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.