Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Shinseki
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 31, 2014No. Civil Action No. 18-1416 (JDB)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Melanie Taylor brings this action against defendants Eric Shinseki, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), Mary Andrus, a/k/a Mary Charles, and Barbara Nugent. Taylor asserts claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; under the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 701; and under various state laws. PL’s 3rd Amend. Compl. [ECF No. 22] (“Compl.”) 1. She seeks injunctive and monetary relief for alleged discrimination…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Martin v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Exelon Generation Co. v. GrumblesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sallyport Global Services, Ltd. v. Arkel International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.