Legal Opinion

In Re Garner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1994No. 92-SP-497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

In this reciprocal discipline case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent’s license to practice law in the District of Columbia be revoked to correspond with his disbarment in New York. We accept the Board’s recommendation and order respondent disbarred in the District of Columbia.

I

Respondent Garner was admitted to the New York Bar in 1961 and, at some time thereafter, to the District of Columbia Bar as well. In 1981 the New York authorities began a disciplinary proceeding against him based on his alleged misconduct in an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. MATTER OF LARSEN v. CanaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In Re KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API