Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1995No. 1995-0394PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 187.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FOWERBAUGH. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh,
1995-Ohio-261.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Misleading or lying to a client concerning a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer by a client—When an attorney engages in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time. When an attorney engages in a course of conduct that violates DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lake County Bar Ass'n v. SperosOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KraemerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.