Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 1996-0522PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 369.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TRUMBO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo,

1996-Ohio-386.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Continually lying to clients, lying to court, and lying to Disciplinary Counsel in the investigation. (No. 96-522—Submitted May 7, 1996—Decided August 21, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-60. __________________ {¶ 1} On August 7, 1995, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, relator, filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McCraeOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API