Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 369.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TRUMBO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo,
1996-Ohio-386.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Continually lying to clients, lying to court, and lying to Disciplinary Counsel in the investigation. (No. 96-522—Submitted May 7, 1996—Decided August 21, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-60. __________________ {¶ 1} On August 7, 1995, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, relator, filed a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McCraeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Akron Bar Assn. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DroeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.