Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2010No. 2009-2336PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Bradley M. Kraemer of West Chester, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0070329, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998. On July 10, 2008, we imposed an interim felony suspension on respondent’s license pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4).' In re Kraemer, 118 Ohio St.3d 1514, 2008-Ohio-3441, 889 N.E.2d 1031.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline now recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for a period of two years, all stayed on conditions, based upon stipulations and findings that respondent misappropriated $7,157.10 in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. YajkoOhio Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BurchinalOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbyOhio Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API