Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2011No. 2010-1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Tom John Karris of Strongsville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0033659, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982.

{¶ 2} On December 7, 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a two-count complaint alleging that respondent had committed professional misconduct by improperly notarizing signatures on four documents and falsely testifying about it during a deposition.

{¶ 3} The board found clear and convincing evidence that respondent had engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation and conduct that adversely reflected on his fitness…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KraemerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. MacalaOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JarvisOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. BingerOhio Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API