Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Robinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2010No. 2009-2267PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David Jerome Robinson of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0059369, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1992, and his attorney registration status is currently inactive. Based upon stipulations and findings that respondent violated four of the Rules of Professional Conduct by giving false and misleading testimony and destroying documents that had potential evidentiary value, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice law in Ohio for two years.

{¶ 2} Respondent objects to the board’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cabe v. LunichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Detling v. ChockleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Cincinnati Bar Association v. WiestOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re Disp.of R. LaJeunesseUtah Supreme Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API