Legal Opinion
Cleary v. Trimble
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1964No. Civ. 10790PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
The controversy concerns an easement claimed by respondents Trimble to a 10-foot-wide dirt road 1,600 feet in length which meanders snakelike along the section line common to Sections 2 and 3, Township South, Range 9 East, M. D. B. & M., extending southerly from an eastwest county road (Carter Road) and into respondents’ property in Sections 2 and 3 (S% of NW]4 of 2; S% of NEi/4 of 3). The trial court upheld the Trimbles’ claim finding that they had an easement (1) by prescription and (2) by map dedication.
Appellant Margie W. Cleary is the owner of the servient tenement. She owns 95 acres in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raab v. CasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mesnick v. CatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Shumate v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.