Glatts v. Henson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Prior to 1931, the defendants Chapman estate and Alfred Chapman, trustee, were the owners of a tract of land. Thereafter it became involved in the seven transactions hereinafter mentioned. First transaction. In that year the Chapmans conveyed to the city of Pasadena Parcel 1 of that tract. They also conveyed to the city a 25-foot easement for road and pipeline purposes over Parcels 4 and 5, the center line of which was the boundary line between those parcels. Second transaction. In 1937, the city deeded Parcel 1 to defendants, the Hensons, who now own it. Third transaction. In 1937, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Currier v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.