Legal Opinion

Glatts v. Henson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1948No. L. A. 19874PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Prior to 1931, the defendants Chapman estate and Alfred Chapman, trustee, were the owners of a tract of land. Thereafter it became involved in the seven transactions hereinafter mentioned. First transaction. In that year the Chapmans conveyed to the city of Pasadena Parcel 1 of that tract. They also conveyed to the city a 25-foot easement for road and pipeline purposes over Parcels 4 and 5, the center line of which was the boundary line between those parcels. Second transaction. In 1937, the city deeded Parcel 1 to defendants, the Hensons, who now own it. Third transaction. In 1937, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Currier v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API