Legal Opinion

Mesnick v. Caton

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1986No. B010114PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Introduction

This case involves a dispute between two neighbors whose property is divided by a fence which stands several feet inside the legal boundary described in plaintiff’s deed.

On November 20, 1981, Michael Mesnick (plaintiff and/or Mesnick), seeking to regain the land beyond the fence, filed a complaint for declaratory relief to establish boundary and quiet title, for tresspass/ejectment, for damages, and for an injunction. The complaint named George W. Catón (defendant and/or Catón) as the defendant, and 10 unnamed defendants who might claim some interest in…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Andalon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Smith v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API