Danielson v. Sykes
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from an order denying a new trial. James W. Taggart, Judge rendering judgment. S. E. Crow; Judge denying new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff sued to enjoin the defendant from obstructing an alleged street or way, which she claims is appurtenant to her lands. Issues were joined, there was- a trial by the court, and the injunction was refused. Prom the judgment and from an order denying a new trial the plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff is the owner of lot 8 in a subdivision of land into lots and streets. Its situation with reference to the way in question, the streets and the adjoining lots, is shown by the following diagrám:
The tract, comprising about sixteen acres, was subdivided in 1893 and the lots were sold by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Haggis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Lane v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.