Legal Opinion

Dana Commercial Credit Corp. v. Ferns & Ferns

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 2001No. B133453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Respondent Dana Commercial Credit Corporation (Dana) seeks sanctions for a frivolous motion by appellants Ferns & Ferns, Barry Ferns and Karen Ragland (hereafter appellants) to recall the remittitur, which issued after dismissal of the appeal became final. 1 , 2

The essential issue presented is whether this court has the inherent authority to impose sanctions for the making of a frivolous motion on appeal, as contrasted with sanctions for the prosecution of a frivolous appeal.

This court has inherent powers requisite to its proper functioning, including the power to preserve…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. LiemsakulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Life v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API