Dana Commercial Credit Corp. v. Ferns & Ferns
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Respondent Dana Commercial Credit Corporation (Dana) seeks sanctions for a frivolous motion by appellants Ferns & Ferns, Barry Ferns and Karen Ragland (hereafter appellants) to recall the remittitur, which issued after dismissal of the appeal became final. 1 , 2
The essential issue presented is whether this court has the inherent authority to impose sanctions for the making of a frivolous motion on appeal, as contrasted with sanctions for the prosecution of a frivolous appeal.
This court has inherent powers requisite to its proper functioning, including the power to preserve…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. LiemsakulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Life v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005