Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2004No. S113272PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted review in this case to address whether Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5, 1 as amended in 1994, authorizes trial courts to award sanctions, including attorney fees, for bad faith litigation actions or tactics that arise from a claim initiated after December 31, 1994. We conclude that the statutory language of section 128.5 and related statutes, and other indicia of legislative intent, establish that section 128.5 does not apply to conduct arising from a claim initiated after December 31, 1994. To the extent the Court of Appeal reached a contrary result, its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. BerlinSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cummins, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API